Politics
U.S. Embassy Closure Would Harm South Sudan

US Considers Closing Embassies and Consulates Worldwide
The United States is considering closing dozens of its embassies and consulates around the world, including in South Sudan. This decision has raised concerns among experts, who believe it would have negative consequences for the country.
Background on the Proposed Closures
An internal State Department document revealed that the US is weighing the closure of nearly 30 overseas embassies and consulates. The document recommends reducing the footprint at US diplomatic missions in Somalia and Iraq, where the US is engaged in counterterrorism efforts, and resizing other diplomatic outposts. The proposed closures include embassies in the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Lesotho, and South Sudan.
Expert Opinion on the Proposed Closures
Dr. Jok Madut Jok, a renowned academic and Professor of Anthropology at Syracuse University, expressed concern over the proposed closures. He believes that closing the US embassy in Juba would be bad news for South Sudan, as it would limit the US’s ability to monitor and address negative developments in the country. Dr. Jok noted that the closure would mean the US can no longer bear witness to challenges such as famine, disease, violence, and human rights abuses in South Sudan.
Potential Consequences of the Closures
The closure of the US embassy in Juba would also mean a severing of engagement between the two countries, leading to a decline in cultural exchanges and research collaborations. Dr. Jok questioned the rationale behind the proposed withdrawal of American diplomatic presence from regions grappling with instability and conflict. He suggested that the move may not be based on comprehensive policy analysis, but rather on the administration’s ideological drive to reduce international commitments and government spending.
US Foreign Aid and Assistance
The Trump administration is also eliminating more than 90% of the US Agency for International Development’s foreign aid contracts and $60 billion in overall US assistance around the world. The funding freeze has stopped thousands of US-funded programs abroad. The administration’s Office of Management and Budget is further proposing to cut funding for United Nations peacekeeping missions, citing recent failures in operations across Africa and the Middle East.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the proposed closure of US embassies and consulates, including in South Sudan, would have significant negative consequences for the country. The move would limit the US’s ability to monitor and address challenges in South Sudan, and would lead to a decline in cultural exchanges and research collaborations. The US should reconsider its decision and prioritize its engagement with South Sudan, rather than abandoning its diplomatic presence in the country.
Politics
Nuer leaders demand Dr. Lomuro’s resignation for ‘ethnic profiling’ comments

JUBA, (Eye Radio) – Political leaders hailing from the Nuer community, as well as lawmakers from the SPLM party, have called for the immediate resignation of Cabinet Affairs Minister Dr. Martin Elia Lomuro, accusing him of making divisive and ethnically charged statements against the Nuer community.
### Divisive Statements Spark Outrage
This follows a press briefing held by Dr. Lomuro on April 26, during which he reportedly categorized the Nuer community as both “friendly and hostile” in the context of national politics.
In a joint statement signed by senior Nuer political leaders known as the Nuer Leadership Peace Forum, including Hon. James Hoth Mai, Hon. Michael Chiangjiek, Dr. John Jooyul, Hassen Deng Gatpan, and Hon. Wiu Kuon, the group condemned what it termed “a derogatory and inflammatory statement.”
### Calls for Resignation and Legal Action
The leaders urged President Salva Kiir to remove Dr. Lomuro from his roles as Cabinet Affairs Minister and Secretary of the High-Level Committee overseeing the peace agreement implementation. They further cautioned that the Nuer Leadership Peace Forum reserves the right to pursue legal action, emphasizing that ethnic profiling constitutes a violation of South Sudanese law.
### Accusations Against Dr. Lomuro
The Forum accused Dr. Lomuro of using his position to defame the Nuer identity and stir ethnic tensions instead of focusing on national unity. They also blamed him for allegedly fueling conflict within his community in Wonduruba, Juba County, and Lainya.
According to the statement, Dr. Lomuro’s remarks risk inciting hostility between the Nuer and other ethnic groups and damaging the historical contributions of the Nuer to the country’s liberation.
### Reactions and Clarifications
The Minister of Youth and Sports, Dr. Joseph Geng Akech, later clarified that the statement of Dr. Lomuro was not directed to the whole Nuer ethnic group but only to organised armed groups in those areas. Dr. Akech emphasized that the government would address these isolated cases of organized groups within communities through the implementation of Chapter Five of the peace agreement, which focuses on reconciliation among communities.
In a separate statement, Nuer SPLM Members in the national parliament “strongly” condemned Dr. Lomuro’s statement, which profiled the Nuer community as either “friendly” or “hostile” to the government. The MPs have also called on President Kiir to immediately remove him from his leadership positions.
### Conclusion
The ongoing controversy surrounding Dr. Martin Elia Lomuro’s remarks highlights the delicate nature of ethnic relations in South Sudan and the importance of promoting unity and inclusivity in governance. As political leaders and lawmakers continue to push for accountability and reconciliation, the path to lasting peace and stability in the country remains a collective effort that must prioritize the well-being and interests of all South Sudanese citizens.
Politics
Nuer leaders demand cabinet minister’s removal for ‘hostile’ rhetoric

Nuer Leaders Call for Dismissal of Minister Over Divisive Comments
Nuer community leaders in Juba are demanding the dismissal of Cabinet Affairs Minister Dr. Martin Elia Lomuro for his divisive remarks labeling certain Nuer-majority counties as “hostile” to the government. The backlash stems from Lomuro’s comments categorizing specific counties as either “friendly” or “hostile” based on their perceived loyalty to President Salva Kiir’s administration.
Accusations of Incitement and “Genocidal Profiling”
The Nuer leaders accuse Lomuro of incitement and “genocidal profiling” for his statements, which they believe exacerbate ethnic tensions in a country still recovering from civil war. Lomuro’s remarks singled out counties such as Nasir, Ulang, Akobo, Nyirol, Uror, Fangak, Ayod, Rubkona, and Panyijiar, alleging their alignment with the opposition SPLM-IO led by detained First Vice President Riek Machar.
Condemnation and Calls for Action
Critics have condemned Lomuro’s comments, warning of the dangerous implications of his rhetoric on ethnic divisions. The Nuer Leadership Peace Forum, led by Labor Minister Gen. James Hoth Mai, rejected attempts to downplay the controversy, labeling Lomuro’s words as a “dangerous escalation” that could undermine peace efforts in the region.
Appeal to President Kiir
The Nuer leaders have called on President Kiir to dismiss Lomuro, citing protections against discrimination in the U.N. Charter. They emphasize the need to address inflammatory language that could further strain relations between ethnic groups, particularly in light of existing tensions from recent conflicts in Jonglei and Equatoria.
Ongoing Instability in South Sudan
South Sudan, a nation that gained independence in 2011, continues to grapple with instability despite a fragile power-sharing agreement between Kiir and Machar. The failure to establish lasting peace has raised concerns ahead of the scheduled elections in December 2026.
As tensions escalate, the Nuer community leaders remain adamant in their demand for accountability and unity in a country striving for stability and reconciliation.
Politics
Oyet distances SPLM-IO from proposed ‘reinvigoration’ of R-ARCSS.

Acting SPLM-IO Chairperson Rejects Government’s Proposed Peace Plan
Unilateral Decision
The Acting Chairperson of SPLM-IO loyal to detained First Vice President Dr. Riek Machar, Oyet Nathaniel, has expressed disagreement with the proposed peace plan unveiled by Cabinet Minister Dr. Elia Lomuro. Oyet stated that the plan was not the position of all peace parties but rather a unilateral decision of the incumbent government.
Proposed Action Plans
Dr. Lomuro announced action plans to speed up the peace deal and proposed the government’s recognition of a legitimate SPLM-IO faction. He also suggested restructuring leadership positions left vacant by detained or absent members of the group. Oyet Nathaniel responded by stating that the plan presented by Dr. Lomuro was invalid as it was not reached at a meeting of the Presidency, Cabinet, and the High-Level Standing Committee (HLSC).
Opposition’s Stance
Oyet Nathaniel emphasized that the response seeks to legitimize violations of the peace agreement and is a unilateral position of the incumbent government component. He also distanced the opposition group from the White Army and called for the unconditional release of Dr. Riek Machar and all political detainees for sustainable peace and stability in the country.
Internal Split within SPLM-IO
The SPLM-IO is currently experiencing internal split following the house arrest of Dr. Riek Machar. Oyet Nathaniel, the acting chairman of SPLM-IO, suspended several senior members accused of conspiring with President Salva Kiir’s government to replace Machar. The Juba faction rejected their suspension, leading to a leadership crisis within the party.
Government’s Response
Information Minister Michael Makuei addressed the issue of vacant positions from the SPLM-IO docket and emphasized the need to resolve these vacancies for the smooth functioning of the transitional government. Makuei outlined the internal divisions within the SPLM-IO and clarified that it is up to the SPLM-IO’s transitional or interim body to request the appointment of replacements for vacant positions.
Conclusion
The disagreement between the Acting SPLM-IO Chairperson and the government highlights the challenges in implementing the peace agreement in South Sudan. The internal split within the SPLM-IO further complicates the situation, emphasizing the need for dialogue and cooperation to achieve lasting peace and stability in the country.
- Health3 days ago
Warrap State Cholera Outbreak 2025: Crisis Deepens Amid Rising Death Toll
- South Sudan2 weeks ago
Western Equatoria Launches Peace Initiative for Youth and Women
- South Sudan2 weeks ago
No Political Motive in Giada Shootout
- Sudan2 weeks ago
Sudan Army Thwarts RSF Drone Attacks
- South Sudan2 weeks ago
Bor Youth Petition for Wildlife Force Relocation Amid Tensions
- Africa2 weeks ago
Mali Officials Shut Down Barrick Gold’s Office Amid Tax Dispute
- Africa2 weeks ago
Investment App Freezes Users Out, Sparking Savings Loss Fears
- Africa2 weeks ago
Algeria Expels French Officials
You must be logged in to post a comment Login