Connect with us

Africa

Paramilitary Fighters Kill Over 100 Civilians, According to Doctors’ Group

Published

on

Paramilitary Fighters Kill Over 100 Civilians, According to Doctors’ Group

Paramilitary Forces Kill More Than 100 Civilians in Southern Sudan

Paramilitary forces killed more than 100 civilians in a brutal attack on the city of Nahud in southern Sudan, according to reports from the Sudan Doctors Network. This latest atrocity highlights the escalating violence and humanitarian crisis gripping the region amidst an ongoing civil war.

Communication Severed Amidst Attack

Communication with residents in Nahud was severely disrupted beginning Thursday, complicating efforts to verify details of the violence independently. Reports on casualties varied significantly, with Al Hadath, a Saudi news channel, estimating 230 civilian deaths, while Al Jazeera reported 19 killed and 37 wounded.

Rapid Support Forces Attack Nahud

The Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a paramilitary group, confirmed they had attacked Nahud, previously under Sudanese military control. Nahud lies along a critical highway linking government-held territories to Darfur, a region increasingly dominated by the RSF.

Rising Civilian Death Toll

The United Nations human rights chief, Volker Türk, reported at least 542 civilian deaths in the region over the past three weeks, cautioning that the actual number might be much higher.

“The horror unfolding in Sudan knows no bounds,” Türk remarked. “My fears are all the greater given the ominous warning by the RSF of ‘bloodshed’ ahead of imminent battles.”

Atrocities Reported in Nahud

The Sudan Doctors Network described Thursday night’s violence in Nahud as a “large-scale massacre,” reporting 21 children and 15 women among the victims. The group also noted extensive looting of medical facilities, markets, pharmacies, and a local hospital.

Desperate Efforts to Contact Family

Residents outside Sudan reported panic as they attempted to reach loved ones amid the communication blackout. Abdallah Almana, 29, expressed despair over his inability to reach his father. “Yesterday, it was possible to reach people, but today, everything just disappeared,” he said. Almana also mentioned a cousin who was tragically killed by a stray bullet.

Evidence from Social Media

Social media videos showed prominent RSF commanders leading attacks in Nahud, further substantiating the severity of the assault.

Siege Disrupts Medical Services

The attack severely disrupted medical services in the area, leaving patients and injured individuals without essential care. Medical resources were looted, exacerbating the crisis.

Conflict and Fears of Partition

This ongoing conflict erupted following the collapse of an alliance between the Sudanese military and the RSF in 2023. The RSF’s declaration of a parallel government in territories it controls raises serious concerns about the potential partitioning of Sudan, echoing the prolonged instability witnessed in Libya since 2011.

The international community continues to monitor the deteriorating situation closely, urging immediate action to halt further atrocities and protect civilians.

 

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Africa

South Sudan Hospital Bombing Kills 7 as Civil War Fears Escalate

Published

on

South Sudan Hospital Bombing Kills 7 as Civil War Fears Escalate

Seven Killed in South Sudan Hospital Bombing as Civil War Fears Grow

South Sudan hospital bombing has claimed at least seven lives in Old Fangak, Jonglei State, with Doctors Without Borders (MSF) reporting a devastating airstrike on the only medical facility serving over 110,000 civilians in the region. The attack has intensified concerns about the nation’s fragile peace and a possible return to full-scale civil war.

Deadly Attack on Hospital and Market

According to MSF, helicopter gunships dropped a bomb directly on the pharmacy of its hospital in Old Fangak. The strike destroyed critical medical supplies and left over 20 civilians wounded. The adjacent local market was also hit, adding to the civilian toll.

The Old Fangak hospital is the only health facility in the entire county, and its destruction leaves the region medically stranded amidst escalating violence.

Violation of International Humanitarian Law

MSF condemned the bombing as a “clear violation of international humanitarian law,” pointing to the targeting of protected civilian infrastructure. Legal experts warn that targeting a functioning hospital constitutes a war crime under the Geneva Conventions.

Local leaders echoed the outrage, stating that such attacks will only deepen resentment, mistrust, and retaliation in already tense regions.

UN Raises Alarm Over Civil War Risk

Nicholas Haysom, head of the United Nations Mission in South Sudan, expressed serious concern over the nation “teetering on the edge of another civil war.” Tensions between President Salva Kiir and Vice President Riek Machar have surged, exacerbated by a feud over security and governance within the transitional unity government.

The recent bombing follows military threats of “punitive action” after several government supply barges were hijacked in the region. Military spokespersons claim anti-government militias, including the White Army, were behind the attacks.

Background: A Nation Haunted by War

South Sudan, the world’s youngest nation, gained independence in 2011 but descended into civil war in 2013 following political rivalries. That conflict killed an estimated 400,000 people and displaced over 2.5 million. A 2018 peace agreement brought a temporary calm, but deep-rooted grievances remain.

With fresh bombings and armed clashes now resurfacing, many fear the country is spiraling back into its violent past.

White Army and Militia Escalations

The White Army—an ethnic Nuer militia—clashed with government troops earlier this year. Its resurgence, along with other armed groups, is complicating peace implementation and threatening stability. Analysts warn that unless contained, these militias could reignite full-scale regional wars.

Global Calls for Civilian Protection

Rights groups and international organizations are calling for an immediate halt to military bombings in civilian-populated areas. “The protection of noncombatants must be prioritized,” one aid group stated. Humanitarian actors now face difficult conditions as access to medical and food relief becomes restricted.

The Road Ahead: Urgent Peace Intervention Needed

The bombing in Old Fangak underscores the urgent need for international diplomatic intervention and regional mediation. Without immediate action, South Sudan risks plunging back into a prolonged and devastating civil conflict.

 

Continue Reading

Africa

The Unfinished National Cathedral of Ghana: A Symbol of Economic Mismanagement

Published

on

The Unfinished National Cathedral of Ghana: A Symbol of Economic Mismanagement

The Unfinished National Cathedral of Ghana: A Symbol of Economic Mismanagement

The Grand Vision Turned Nightmare

Ghana’s National Cathedral was once envisioned as a grand monument to God and country. But today, its walls are plywood barriers, its spires replaced by idle cranes, and its foundations echo with the croaks of frogs nesting in stagnant rainwater.

A Costly Project in a Debt-Saddled Country

Former President Nana Akufo-Addo allocated over $58 million in public funds to the cathedral — a portion of a planned $400 million project. This comes at a time when Ghana’s economy faces “severe distress,” according to the finance ministry’s March assessment. The country is grappling with record inflation, currency devaluation, and rising public debt.

The Controversy Surrounding the Cathedral

The cathedral was designed by world-renowned architect David Adjaye. Yet, apart from architectural drawings and a hole in the ground, little progress has been made.

“They have only dug a hole — a big hole.”
— Praise Chinedu, university student and Pentecostal Christian

Across Accra, locals sarcastically refer to it as “the most expensive hole in the world.” Once hailed as a religious landmark, the project has instead become a punchline and a political weapon.

The Political Fallout

With Akufo-Addo out of office, the cathedral now faces near-certain abandonment. The new administration has placed it under scrutiny as part of its anticorruption drive, “Operation Recover All Loot.” Allegations of procurement breaches have led to calls for a forensic audit. A public ombudsman flagged major irregularities in the project’s funding and contracting process.

The Failed Vision

Despite its ambition, the project never garnered the widespread support Akufo-Addo expected. As the economy collapsed under inflation and mounting debt, the idea of spending hundreds of millions on a cathedral drew growing backlash — even from devout Christians.

The President’s Pledge to God

In a 2019 fundraising dinner in Washington, Akufo-Addo stated:

“I made a pledge to God that if I become the president — after two unsuccessful attempts — in the 2016 presidential elections, I will build a cathedral to the glory of God.”

Critics questioned whether taxpayer funds should finance what they view as a personal religious promise. Construction slowed, and public anger intensified.

The Aftermath

Today, few Ghanaians — even among religious leaders — openly defend the project. Many believe the former president should complete the cathedral using his own resources, not public funds.

The Future of the Cathedral

With state funding withdrawn, construction has halted indefinitely. The site remains a rain-soaked foundation ringed by fences — and no clear plan forward.

A Lesson Learned

The unfinished National Cathedral is now a symbol of failed leadership, public waste, and poor fiscal planning. It highlights the dangers of prioritizing personal legacy over national stability.

As Ghana continues to navigate economic recovery, the cathedral serves as a reminder that public trust is sacred — and must never be traded for vanity projects.

Published: May 2025 | South Sudan Online – Africa Desk

Francis Kokutse contributed reporting.

 

Continue Reading

Africa

Thiam Banned from Ivorian Presidential Election Due to Nationality Dispute

Published

on

Thiam Banned from Ivorian Presidential Election Due to Nationality Dispute

In a dramatic development, prominent Ivorian politician Thiam has been banned from participating in the upcoming presidential election following a contentious dispute over his nationality. This significant ruling, delivered by the Ivorian court, has reshaped the political landscape just weeks ahead of the election.

Loss of Ivorian Citizenship Sparks Controversy

The court ruled that Thiam forfeited his Ivorian citizenship when he acquired French citizenship in 1987. This decision directly impacted his eligibility to run for president, reigniting longstanding debates around dual citizenship, a divisive issue in Ivory Coast and many other nations.

Court Upholds Decision Despite Thiam’s Renunciation

Although Thiam had officially renounced his French nationality in recent years, the court determined that his prior French citizenship at the time of voter registration was grounds for removing him from the electoral roll. This ruling effectively halted his presidential campaign.

Legal Experts: Court Decision Final

Legal analysts have clarified that the court’s decision is definitive and cannot be appealed, severely impacting Thiam’s political ambitions. Nonetheless, Thiam remains defiant and has publicly committed to challenging the ruling, declaring his resolve to continue pursuing his presidential bid.

“I remain committed to running in this election and will fight for my right to participate,” Thiam stated, indicating plans to seek further legal recourse.

Nationality Dispute Fuels Political Tensions

The nationality controversy has deeply polarized the political environment in Ivory Coast. Thiam’s supporters and critics alike have been vocal, highlighting the broader implications surrounding dual citizenship and eligibility for high political office.

Critics argue that the ruling raises serious questions about electoral fairness and transparency, potentially undermining public confidence in the democratic process.

Thiam’s Appeal and Future Prospects

As Thiam prepares to escalate his legal battle, the future of his political career remains uncertain. The forthcoming judicial proceedings will be closely monitored by both national and international observers, with significant implications for the political stability and democratic processes in Ivory Coast.

The outcome of this appeal could set a crucial precedent, influencing future rulings on citizenship and political eligibility.

Broader Implications for Ivorian Politics

This judicial decision has sent shockwaves through Ivory Coast’s political circles, significantly altering the dynamics of the upcoming presidential election. Thiam’s determination to appeal underscores his unwavering commitment to political participation, despite significant setbacks.

As this legal saga unfolds, attention remains focused on how this dispute will influence voter perceptions, electoral fairness, and the overall credibility of the upcoming elections.

 

Continue Reading

Our Newsletter

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending