India’s Crackdown on Muslims After Kashmir Attack

Concerns over Targeting of Muslims

Public anger has swelled after a terrorist attack in Kashmir left 26 people dead, mostly Hindu tourists. India has blamed Pakistan for the attack, leading to escalating tensions between the two countries.

Punitive Measures and Harassment

India’s response to the attack has included threats of military action against Pakistan. Meanwhile, right-wing Hindu groups have intensified harassment of Muslims, framing it as a crackdown on illegal migrants.

Violence Against Muslims

Reports of killings of Muslims in states like Uttar Pradesh and Karnataka have raised concerns of hate crimes. Security forces in Kashmir have detained hundreds and demolished property in their search for the attackers.

Anti-Muslim Sentiment

The backlash after the attack has targeted Kashmiris and spread to wider anti-Muslim sentiment. This demonization of Muslims has been used by Prime Minister Modi’s party to unite the Hindu majority.

Muslims Facing Harassment

Muslims in different parts of India, including students and workers, have reported harassment and violence following the attack. In some cases, the violence has been claimed by Hindu groups seeking revenge.

Indiscriminate Arrests and Demolitions

In Gujarat, thousands of suspected Bangladeshi citizens have been arrested, with only a fraction found to be illegal immigrants. The government has also carried out demolitions in Muslim slums, leading to accusations of unlawful and unconstitutional actions.

The crackdown on Muslims in India following the Kashmir attack raises concerns about the exploitation of the situation by right-wing Hindu nationalists. The targeting of Muslims through detentions and property demolitions has sparked fears of escalating tensions and violence in the country.

Al Jazeera’s @khalidmajzoubofficial Looks at US Claims About the Intensified Bombing Campaign in Yemen

The United States claims that the intensified bombing campaign in Yemen is necessary to combat terrorism and protect national security. However, Al Jazeera’s @khalidmajzoubofficial takes a closer look at these claims to determine their validity.

US Justification for Intensified Bombing

The US justifies its intensified bombing campaign in Yemen by stating that it is targeting terrorist organizations such as Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and the Islamic State (IS). The US argues that these groups pose a significant threat to regional and global security, and that military action is necessary to eliminate them.

Civilian Casualties

Despite the US claims, there have been numerous reports of civilian casualties resulting from the intensified bombing campaign in Yemen. Human rights organizations have documented the deaths of innocent men, women, and children as a result of US airstrikes. This raises questions about the accuracy of the US targeting and the potential for collateral damage.

Impact on Yemeni Society

The intensified bombing campaign in Yemen has had a devastating impact on the country’s society and infrastructure. Schools, hospitals, and civilian infrastructure have been destroyed, leaving many Yemenis without access to basic services. The ongoing conflict has also led to a humanitarian crisis, with millions of Yemenis facing food insecurity and lack of access to healthcare.

Alternative Solutions

Instead of relying on military force, Al Jazeera’s @khalidmajzoubofficial suggests that the US should prioritize diplomatic and political solutions to address the root causes of terrorism in Yemen. This includes promoting dialogue, supporting peace negotiations, and addressing the grievances of marginalized communities. By focusing on sustainable solutions, the US can help bring stability and security to Yemen without resorting to violence.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the US claims about the intensified bombing campaign in Yemen raise important questions about the effectiveness and consequences of military action. By critically examining these claims and exploring alternative solutions, we can work towards a more peaceful and sustainable future for Yemen and its people.

Canadians are holding parliamentary elections today to determine who will lead their government: the Liberal Party under Prime Minister Mark Carney, a former banker, or the Conservatives, led by Pierre Poilievre, a career politician on the party’s right.

One issue has consumed voters: President Trump. His tariff attack on Canada and his repeated calls for the annexation of the country as the 51st state have dominated the race.

To learn about what’s at stake, we reached out to Matina Stevis-Gridneff, our Canada bureau chief.

What are the biggest issues in the elections?

Canadians are thinking about the economy, and about Trump. The two are, to a great degree, intertwined: Canada’s economy is in a relatively weak spot as it’s getting hit by tariffs. Some voters want to punish the Liberal Party, which has been in charge for the past decade, and hold it accountable for leaving the country in a weakened spot.

Those voters are likely to cast a ballot for the Conservative Party. The Conservatives are promising change, smaller government, tax cuts and deregulation. But other voters — and polls suggest they may be the majority — are predominantly worried about how Canada stands up to the U.S. This relates to tariffs, but it extends beyond the purely economic, to the political and even existential spheres, given that Trump has threatened to annex Canada.

Voters motivated by that mind-set are likelier to pick the Liberal Party. Mark Carney is a seasoned international economic policymaker and private-sector executive, and his experience in economic turmoil has led many Canadians to believe he’s the right person to trust in this crisis.

What will you be watching for on Election Day, and what has stood out for you so far?

I’ll be looking to see if the Liberals win, as polls are predicting, and if they can secure a majority government. For me that will indicate that Trump is a potent factor in the politics of America’s allies, who are all reeling by the change of policy and attitude in the White House.

The sharp reversal of fortunes for the Liberal Party which, until early this year, seemed poised to face a crushing defeat, has been stunning to watch. And in that context, the rise of Carney from elite economist to prime minister in the blink of an eye, and with no previous political experience, has been really surprising.

Results: Most polls will close at 9:30 p.m. Eastern time today, and results will most likely come later in the evening. Here’s what else to know.