Connect with us

Politics

Activist criticizes leaders’ inability to achieve peace as South Sudan’s allies close embassies.

Published

on

Activist criticizes leaders’ inability to achieve peace as South Sudan’s allies close embassies.

Activist Points to Disappointment with Lack of Commitment to Peace

Activist Edmund Yakani recently expressed his concerns about the closure of embassies and consulates by South Sudan’s traditional allies. He believes that this reflects their disappointment with the lack of commitment from the country’s political leaders to deliver lasting peace.

Foreign Nations Express Disappointment

Yakani, the Executive Director of Community Empowerment for Progress Organization (CEPO), stated that the closure of diplomatic missions in South Sudan is a clear expression of great disappointment. He highlighted the sluggish efforts by South Sudanese leaders in transitioning the country from chronic violence to peace as the main concern that foreign nations may not have expressed.

Western Nations Taking Action

The trend of embassy closures in South Sudan has been exemplified by recent decisions from Western nations. The Cabinet of the Kingdom of the Netherlands approved a proposal to close embassies in South Sudan and other parts of the world, while the Norwegian government temporarily shut down its embassy in Juba due to security concerns.

Need for Change in Strategy

Yakani emphasized the need for South Sudan to have a change of strategy and approach to the political transitional process in the country. He warned against weaponizing information for political objectives, stating that it is a crime to spread hate speech, propaganda, or fake news.

Implications of Embassy Closures

The closure of embassies by South Sudan’s traditional allies reflects a broader trend of shrinking Western diplomatic footprints in the country. This could potentially isolate South Sudan from its international partners and hinder efforts towards peace and development.

Final Thoughts

Yakani’s remarks serve as a wake-up call for South Sudanese leaders to prioritize peace and stability in the country. The closure of embassies and the withdrawal of diplomatic missions highlight the urgent need for concrete actions towards lasting peace in South Sudan.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Nuer leaders demand Dr. Lomuro’s resignation for ‘ethnic profiling’ comments

Published

on

Nuer leaders demand Dr. Lomuro’s resignation for ‘ethnic profiling’ comments

Nuer Political Backlash: Cabinet Affairs Minister Faces Resignation Calls After “Hostile vs. Friendly” Remark

Juba, South Sudan | May 2025

Nuer political backlash erupted after Cabinet Affairs Minister Dr Martin Elia Lomuro branded several Nuer-inhabited counties “hostile” during a 26 April press briefing. What began as a routine update has become the most serious ethnic controversy since the 2018 revitalized peace deal.

Table of Contents

  1. What Triggered the Outrage?
  2. Nuer Leadership Peace Forum Responds
  3. SPLM Lawmakers Turn Up the Heat
  4. Demands: Resignation, Retraction & Legal Action
  5. Government’s Clarification Attempt
  6. Historic Role of the Nuer in Liberation
  7. Implications for National Stability
  8. Way Forward: Healing Through Inclusive Dialogue

1. What Triggered the Outrage?

During an Eye Radio–covered press conference, Dr Lomuro categorised nine Nuer counties as “hostile” to government and seven as “friendly.” Critics say the terminology revives wartime language that once inflamed violence across Upper Nile and Jonglei.

2. Nuer Leadership Peace Forum Responds

A joint communiqué signed by Labour Minister James Hoth Mai, former Interior Minister Michael Chiangjiek, Dr John Jooyul, Hassen Deng Gatpan and Wiu Kuon condemned the remark as “derogatory and inflammatory,” warning that ethnic profiling violates the nation’s constitution.

3. SPLM Lawmakers Turn Up the Heat

Nuer Members of Parliament in the Reconstituted Transitional Legislative Assembly echoed the outrage, stressing that community labelling threatens the fragile unity government painstakingly built since 2020.

4. Demands: Resignation, Retraction & Legal Action

  • Immediate dismissal from the Ministry of Cabinet Affairs and all peace-oversight roles.
  • Public apology and full withdrawal of the “hostile vs. friendly” categorisation.
  • Pursuit of legal remedy if corrective measures are not enacted within 14 days.

5. Government’s Clarification Attempt

Youth and Sports Minister Dr Joseph Geng Akech later claimed Lomuro’s reference was aimed only at “organised armed groups,” not the wider Nuer populace, and pointed to the reconciliation chapter of the peace agreement as the mechanism to address local militias.

6. Historic Role of the Nuer in Liberation

Critics argue the remark erases the Nuer’s pivotal role in the liberation struggle—from the Fangak 1993 defence to frontline leadership by Generals James Hoth Mai and Peter Gadet. Their contributions remain central to South Sudan’s independence narrative.

7. Implications for National Stability

The controversy surfaces as elections approach and security-sector reforms remain unfinished. Analysts warn that polarising language from senior officials could erode public trust and destabilise regions already grappling with communal conflicts.

8. Way Forward: Healing Through Inclusive Dialogue

Church leaders and civil-society groups propose a televised town-hall meeting where Lomuro addresses grievances directly with Nuer elders. Advocates say transparent dialogue can reaffirm that no community is inherently “hostile” or “friendly” but equally South Sudanese.

Conclusion

The Nuer political backlash against Dr Martin Elia Lomuro illustrates the enduring sensitivity of ethnic rhetoric in South Sudan. Whether through resignation, apology or constructive dialogue, the outcome will test the nation’s commitment to inclusive governance and lasting peace.

Stay with South Sudan Online for continuous coverage of politics, reconciliation and nation-building.

Continue Reading

Politics

Nuer leaders demand cabinet minister’s removal for ‘hostile’ rhetoric

Published

on

Nuer leaders demand cabinet minister’s removal for ‘hostile’ rhetoric

Nuer Leaders Call for Dismissal of Minister Over Divisive Comments

Nuer community leaders in Juba are demanding the dismissal of Cabinet Affairs Minister Dr. Martin Elia Lomuro for his divisive remarks labeling certain Nuer-majority counties as “hostile” to the government. The backlash stems from Lomuro’s comments categorizing specific counties as either “friendly” or “hostile” based on their perceived loyalty to President Salva Kiir’s administration.

Accusations of Incitement and “Genocidal Profiling”

The Nuer leaders accuse Lomuro of incitement and “genocidal profiling” for his statements, which they believe exacerbate ethnic tensions in a country still recovering from civil war. Lomuro’s remarks singled out counties such as Nasir, Ulang, Akobo, Nyirol, Uror, Fangak, Ayod, Rubkona, and Panyijiar, alleging their alignment with the opposition SPLM-IO led by detained First Vice President Riek Machar.

Condemnation and Calls for Action

Critics have condemned Lomuro’s comments, warning of the dangerous implications of his rhetoric on ethnic divisions. The Nuer Leadership Peace Forum, led by Labor Minister Gen. James Hoth Mai, rejected attempts to downplay the controversy, labeling Lomuro’s words as a “dangerous escalation” that could undermine peace efforts in the region.

Appeal to President Kiir

The Nuer leaders have called on President Kiir to dismiss Lomuro, citing protections against discrimination in the U.N. Charter. They emphasize the need to address inflammatory language that could further strain relations between ethnic groups, particularly in light of existing tensions from recent conflicts in Jonglei and Equatoria.

Ongoing Instability in South Sudan

South Sudan, a nation that gained independence in 2011, continues to grapple with instability despite a fragile power-sharing agreement between Kiir and Machar. The failure to establish lasting peace has raised concerns ahead of the scheduled elections in December 2026.

As tensions escalate, the Nuer community leaders remain adamant in their demand for accountability and unity in a country striving for stability and reconciliation.

Continue Reading

Politics

Oyet distances SPLM-IO from proposed ‘reinvigoration’ of R-ARCSS.

Published

on

Oyet distances SPLM-IO from proposed ‘reinvigoration’ of R-ARCSS.

Acting SPLM-IO Chairperson Rejects Government’s Proposed Peace Plan

Unilateral Decision

The Acting Chairperson of SPLM-IO loyal to detained First Vice President Dr. Riek Machar, Oyet Nathaniel, has expressed disagreement with the proposed peace plan unveiled by Cabinet Minister Dr. Elia Lomuro. Oyet stated that the plan was not the position of all peace parties but rather a unilateral decision of the incumbent government.

Proposed Action Plans

Dr. Lomuro announced action plans to speed up the peace deal and proposed the government’s recognition of a legitimate SPLM-IO faction. He also suggested restructuring leadership positions left vacant by detained or absent members of the group. Oyet Nathaniel responded by stating that the plan presented by Dr. Lomuro was invalid as it was not reached at a meeting of the Presidency, Cabinet, and the High-Level Standing Committee (HLSC).

Opposition’s Stance

Oyet Nathaniel emphasized that the response seeks to legitimize violations of the peace agreement and is a unilateral position of the incumbent government component. He also distanced the opposition group from the White Army and called for the unconditional release of Dr. Riek Machar and all political detainees for sustainable peace and stability in the country.

Internal Split within SPLM-IO

The SPLM-IO is currently experiencing internal split following the house arrest of Dr. Riek Machar. Oyet Nathaniel, the acting chairman of SPLM-IO, suspended several senior members accused of conspiring with President Salva Kiir’s government to replace Machar. The Juba faction rejected their suspension, leading to a leadership crisis within the party.

Government’s Response

Information Minister Michael Makuei addressed the issue of vacant positions from the SPLM-IO docket and emphasized the need to resolve these vacancies for the smooth functioning of the transitional government. Makuei outlined the internal divisions within the SPLM-IO and clarified that it is up to the SPLM-IO’s transitional or interim body to request the appointment of replacements for vacant positions.

Conclusion

The disagreement between the Acting SPLM-IO Chairperson and the government highlights the challenges in implementing the peace agreement in South Sudan. The internal split within the SPLM-IO further complicates the situation, emphasizing the need for dialogue and cooperation to achieve lasting peace and stability in the country.

Continue Reading

Our Newsletter

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending