Nuer Leaders Call for Dismissal of Minister Over Divisive Comments

Nuer community leaders in Juba are demanding the dismissal of Cabinet Affairs Minister Dr. Martin Elia Lomuro for his divisive remarks labeling certain Nuer-majority counties as “hostile” to the government. The backlash stems from Lomuro’s comments categorizing specific counties as either “friendly” or “hostile” based on their perceived loyalty to President Salva Kiir’s administration.

Accusations of Incitement and “Genocidal Profiling”

The Nuer leaders accuse Lomuro of incitement and “genocidal profiling” for his statements, which they believe exacerbate ethnic tensions in a country still recovering from civil war. Lomuro’s remarks singled out counties such as Nasir, Ulang, Akobo, Nyirol, Uror, Fangak, Ayod, Rubkona, and Panyijiar, alleging their alignment with the opposition SPLM-IO led by detained First Vice President Riek Machar.

Condemnation and Calls for Action

Critics have condemned Lomuro’s comments, warning of the dangerous implications of his rhetoric on ethnic divisions. The Nuer Leadership Peace Forum, led by Labor Minister Gen. James Hoth Mai, rejected attempts to downplay the controversy, labeling Lomuro’s words as a “dangerous escalation” that could undermine peace efforts in the region.

Appeal to President Kiir

The Nuer leaders have called on President Kiir to dismiss Lomuro, citing protections against discrimination in the U.N. Charter. They emphasize the need to address inflammatory language that could further strain relations between ethnic groups, particularly in light of existing tensions from recent conflicts in Jonglei and Equatoria.

Ongoing Instability in South Sudan

South Sudan, a nation that gained independence in 2011, continues to grapple with instability despite a fragile power-sharing agreement between Kiir and Machar. The failure to establish lasting peace has raised concerns ahead of the scheduled elections in December 2026.

As tensions escalate, the Nuer community leaders remain adamant in their demand for accountability and unity in a country striving for stability and reconciliation.

Acting SPLM-IO Chairperson Rejects Government’s Proposed Peace Plan

Unilateral Decision

The Acting Chairperson of SPLM-IO loyal to detained First Vice President Dr. Riek Machar, Oyet Nathaniel, has expressed disagreement with the proposed peace plan unveiled by Cabinet Minister Dr. Elia Lomuro. Oyet stated that the plan was not the position of all peace parties but rather a unilateral decision of the incumbent government.

Proposed Action Plans

Dr. Lomuro announced action plans to speed up the peace deal and proposed the government’s recognition of a legitimate SPLM-IO faction. He also suggested restructuring leadership positions left vacant by detained or absent members of the group. Oyet Nathaniel responded by stating that the plan presented by Dr. Lomuro was invalid as it was not reached at a meeting of the Presidency, Cabinet, and the High-Level Standing Committee (HLSC).

Opposition’s Stance

Oyet Nathaniel emphasized that the response seeks to legitimize violations of the peace agreement and is a unilateral position of the incumbent government component. He also distanced the opposition group from the White Army and called for the unconditional release of Dr. Riek Machar and all political detainees for sustainable peace and stability in the country.

Internal Split within SPLM-IO

The SPLM-IO is currently experiencing internal split following the house arrest of Dr. Riek Machar. Oyet Nathaniel, the acting chairman of SPLM-IO, suspended several senior members accused of conspiring with President Salva Kiir’s government to replace Machar. The Juba faction rejected their suspension, leading to a leadership crisis within the party.

Government’s Response

Information Minister Michael Makuei addressed the issue of vacant positions from the SPLM-IO docket and emphasized the need to resolve these vacancies for the smooth functioning of the transitional government. Makuei outlined the internal divisions within the SPLM-IO and clarified that it is up to the SPLM-IO’s transitional or interim body to request the appointment of replacements for vacant positions.

Conclusion

The disagreement between the Acting SPLM-IO Chairperson and the government highlights the challenges in implementing the peace agreement in South Sudan. The internal split within the SPLM-IO further complicates the situation, emphasizing the need for dialogue and cooperation to achieve lasting peace and stability in the country.

A Nation at a Crossroads

South Sudan on the brink of civil war once again reminds the world of the fragile dream born with so much hope on July 9, 2011. After decades of struggle against Sudanese rule, independence was supposed to bring peace, prosperity, and unity. Instead, old wounds, tribal loyalties, and political ambitions have reopened, threatening to undo the sacrifices of generations.

Today, with violence flaring between factions loyal to President Salva Kiir and those associated with former Vice President Riek Machar, South Sudan stands at a defining moment. Will it succumb to another devastating civil war, or will it find a new path forward? The answer will shape the destiny of Africa’s youngest nation for decades to come.

The Deep Roots of Conflict: A History Back to 1950

President Salva Kiir of South Sudan during official event

To understand South Sudan’s current crisis, one must travel back to the early 1950s. British colonial administrators, facing demands for Sudanese independence, ignored deep cultural, religious, and ethnic divisions between the Arab-Muslim north and the African-Christian south.

In 1956, Sudan gained independence. Almost immediately, tensions exploded. Southern Sudanese, who had little political representation, faced Arabization policies that marginalized their identity, language, and religion. By 1955, even before official independence, the First Sudanese Civil War had begun, lasting until 1972.

The Addis Ababa Agreement of 1972 provided autonomy for the south but failed to address deeper grievances. When President Jaafar Nimeiry attempted to impose Islamic law nationwide in 1983, the Second Sudanese Civil War erupted, leading to over two million deaths and four million displacements over 22 brutal years.

The Rise of SPLM/A

Emerging from the chaos was the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A), founded by Dr. John Garang. Garang envisioned a “New Sudan” of equality, not immediate secession. However, divisions even within the SPLM/A soon emerged, notably between Garang’s vision and the more secessionist agenda of others, including Riek Machar.

These early splits sowed seeds of mistrust that still haunt South Sudanese politics.

Independence and the Birth of a Fragile State

The Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) in 2005 ended the civil war, granting the south autonomy and setting the stage for a referendum. Tragically, Dr. Garang died shortly after in a helicopter crash, removing a unifying figure.

In 2011, an overwhelming 98.83% of South Sudanese voted for independence. The Republic of South Sudan was born in a moment of euphoria, but with fragile institutions, an underdeveloped economy, and deep-seated ethnic divisions.

The Descent into Internal Conflict

Riek Machar Addressing South Sudan Crisis

The Kiir-Machar Power Struggle

Initially, President Salva Kiir and Vice President Riek Machar promised a broad-based government. Yet political rivalry and ethnic tension simmered beneath the surface: Kiir, a Dinka; Machar, a Nuer.

In 2013, amid accusations of an attempted coup by Machar’s allies, violence erupted in Juba. What began as a political struggle quickly spiraled into an ethnic bloodbath.

The South Sudanese Civil War (2013–2018) displaced four million people and killed nearly 400,000. Entire towns were razed. Neighbors turned against each other. The young nation plunged into despair.

The 2018 Peace Agreement: A Fragile Hope

The Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS) in 2018 created a unity government. Machar returned as Vice President. Hopes rose, but implementation lagged. Key provisions—security sector reforms, constitutional review, elections—stalled.

Meanwhile, economic hardship deepened, fueled by corruption, declining oil revenues, and international aid fatigue.

The Current Crisis: 2025 and Beyond

Recent reports show rising tensions in Upper Nile State, Jonglei, and other regions. Factions loyal to both Kiir and Machar are rearming. Minor clashes have escalated into major skirmishes. Civilians are again fleeing into the bush.

According to the World Food Programme, over 7 million South Sudanese face severe food insecurity in 2025. Meanwhile, UNHCR reports that over 2.2 million people remain displaced within the country’s borders. The World Health Organization warns of escalating cholera outbreaks compounding the crisis. The overall humanitarian situation, as outlined by UN OCHA, impacts over 9.4 million South Sudanese civilians today.

Root Causes Behind Today’s Violence

• Unaddressed Historical Grievances: Colonial-era divisions and decades of war left deep scars.
• Ethnic Politics: Power is often seen through tribal lenses, not national unity.
• Weak Institutions: Courts, police, and government ministries are weak or politicized.
• Oil Dependency: Competition over control of oil fields fuels tensions.
• Lack of Reconciliation: Perpetrators of past atrocities have rarely been held accountable.
• External Meddling: Neighboring countries have often supported different factions for their own interests.

The Way Forward: Breaking the Cycle

1. National Dialogue Must Be Real, Not Cosmetic

A genuine, inclusive dialogue involving grassroots leaders, women, youth, religious leaders, and elders—not just political elites—is crucial.

2. Transitional Justice

Truth commissions, local justice initiatives, and hybrid courts must address past atrocities. Without accountability, there can be no trust.

3. Build National Identity

Civic education promoting “South Sudanese” identity over tribal affiliation must be introduced, especially in schools.

4. Diversify the Economy

Dependency on oil exports fuels corruption and competition. Investment in agriculture, education, and infrastructure will empower local economies and reduce grievances.

5. Empower Women and Youth

Women and youth made up the majority of victims and fighters. They must be at the center of any peacebuilding and leadership efforts.

A Message to the Future Generation of South Sudan

Young South Sudanese man proudly carrying national flag

To the young men and women of South Sudan:

You are not the prisoners of the past. You are the architects of tomorrow. Tribalism, hatred, and revenge are legacies you do not have to inherit.

Imagine a South Sudan where a child’s future is determined not by their tribe, but by their dreams. Imagine cities where Dinka, Nuer, Azande, Bari, and Murle live side by side, not as rivals but as brothers and sisters.

You can break the cycle.

Reject the politics of warlords. Reject the manipulation of identity. Build schools, not militias. Create art, not armies. Plant seeds, not landmines.

The world is watching. But more importantly, your children and grandchildren will be watching. What will you leave them?

You can leave them a nation reborn.

Conclusion: Hope Amid the Ashes

South Sudan’s story is not yet finished. Though the drums of war beat ominously, the song of peace can still rise.

It will not be easy. Forgiveness must overcome hatred. Courage must silence fear. Wisdom must replace blind ambition.

But the same spirit that carried South Sudanese through decades of struggle can carry them through this dark hour into a new dawn.

From the ashes of pain can rise a country that proves to the world—and to itself—that the dream of South Sudan is alive.

And it is worth fighting for, not with bullets, but with hope.