Acting SPLM-IO Chairperson Rejects Government’s Proposed Peace Plan

Unilateral Decision

The Acting Chairperson of SPLM-IO loyal to detained First Vice President Dr. Riek Machar, Oyet Nathaniel, has expressed disagreement with the proposed peace plan unveiled by Cabinet Minister Dr. Elia Lomuro. Oyet stated that the plan was not the position of all peace parties but rather a unilateral decision of the incumbent government.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Proposed Action Plans

Dr. Lomuro announced action plans to speed up the peace deal and proposed the government’s recognition of a legitimate SPLM-IO faction. He also suggested restructuring leadership positions left vacant by detained or absent members of the group. Oyet Nathaniel responded by stating that the plan presented by Dr. Lomuro was invalid as it was not reached at a meeting of the Presidency, Cabinet, and the High-Level Standing Committee (HLSC).

Opposition’s Stance

Oyet Nathaniel emphasized that the response seeks to legitimize violations of the peace agreement and is a unilateral position of the incumbent government component. He also distanced the opposition group from the White Army and called for the unconditional release of Dr. Riek Machar and all political detainees for sustainable peace and stability in the country.

Internal Split within SPLM-IO

The SPLM-IO is currently experiencing internal split following the house arrest of Dr. Riek Machar. Oyet Nathaniel, the acting chairman of SPLM-IO, suspended several senior members accused of conspiring with President Salva Kiir’s government to replace Machar. The Juba faction rejected their suspension, leading to a leadership crisis within the party.

Government’s Response

Information Minister Michael Makuei addressed the issue of vacant positions from the SPLM-IO docket and emphasized the need to resolve these vacancies for the smooth functioning of the transitional government. Makuei outlined the internal divisions within the SPLM-IO and clarified that it is up to the SPLM-IO’s transitional or interim body to request the appointment of replacements for vacant positions.

Conclusion

The disagreement between the Acting SPLM-IO Chairperson and the government highlights the challenges in implementing the peace agreement in South Sudan. The internal split within the SPLM-IO further complicates the situation, emphasizing the need for dialogue and cooperation to achieve lasting peace and stability in the country.